Cases 1 - 10 of 49
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COX et al v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. COX, II, HEATHER K. COX and COXS AG SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL CORNELL, CHRISTOPHER ALTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2022cv01838
Plaintiff:
MICAH ANDERSON
Defendant:
DAVID N. WATSON and BRYAN L. ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leibensparger et al v. Berdanier et al
as 3:2019cv01427
Plaintiff:
Bradley L Merwine, Daniel Saranchak, Robert Rountree and others
Defendant:
Lt. Phil Chattin, Correctional Officer, Billy Joe Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: BRUCE MURRAY
as 2:2019mc00078
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVAINA and DAVID N. SAVITT
Petitioner:
BRUCE MURRAY
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Grochowski et al
as 3:2018cv01404
Defendant:
Joseph Szeliga, Paul Domalakis, Berks County Prison and others
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHOQUETTE et al
as 5:2018cv00404
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID N. CHOQUETTE, JR. and CRYSTAL GARNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
LOR v. WANGLEY et al
as 2:2017cv05532
Petitioner:
TEPONG LOR
Respondent:
GEORGE WANGLEY, DAVID N. CZAPO, NICHOLAS E. ORLYK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MORALES et al v. SENTRY
as 5:2017cv02643
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MORALES and ELSA MORALES
Defendant:
DAVID N. SENTRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
