Cases 1 - 10 of 11
John Shockley v. Lorie Davis
as 18-11174
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DAVID SHOCKLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Shockley v. Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
as 3:2016cv00304
Petitioner:
John David Shockley
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director, TDCJ-ID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shockley et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 1:2015cv13844
Plaintiff:
Alaina Shockley and David Shockley
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as ALN/4:15-cv-01890
Plaintiff:
Alaina Shockley and David Shockley
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Shockley et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as 4:2015cv01890
Plaintiff:
Alaina Shockley and David Shockley
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shockley v. Hawthorne et al
as 3:2012cv00869
Plaintiff:
John David Shockley
Defendant:
Teresa Hawthorne, Layne Jackson, Leah Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockley v. Wideman et al
as 3:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
John David Shockley
Defendant:
NFN Wideman, NFN Kinzer and NFN Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shockley v. Valdez
as 3:2012cv00749
Petitioner:
John David Shockley
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shockley v. Hawthorne et al
as 3:2012cv00622
Plaintiff:
John David Shockley
Defendant:
Parkland Health and Hospital System, NFN Porsa, NFN Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Methworld International Financ v. Steven Christensen, et al
as 10-16330
Plaintiff - Appellee:
METHWORLD INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
KARIS ANGELIA MANAGEMENT, INC., R. CHRISTOPHER MANFREDONIA, CARL WINTERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN CHRISTENSEN
Respondent-intervenor:
ARTHUR B. KESTER
Real-party-in-interest:
JOSEPH W. HANDLEY, BELINDA BARON, CLARK MCKAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
