Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Nelms et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv03075
Plaintiff:
Hinton Nelms, Lewis Love, Patrick Hupp and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Nelms et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv06729
Plaintiff:
Hinton Nelms, Lewis Love, Patrick Hupp and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Simmons v. Salazar et al
as 5:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
Ryan David Simmons
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, Capt. FNU Reyes, Capt. FNU Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. The Texas Prison System
as 4:2022cv01788
Plaintiff:
Mark David Simmons
Defendant:
The Texas Prison System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
HARRY CARTER, ROSEMARIE LUCERO, DOREEN HAINES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58632
Plaintiff:
WYNDELL DAVID SIMMONS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. PPD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05234
Defendant:
Colin Hill, Joe Bress, Allen Thorpe and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Bowles v. PPD, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04874
Plaintiff:
Charles Bowles
Defendant:
Colin Hill, Joe Bress, Allen Thorpe and others
Daniels v. PPD, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv04784
Defendant:
Allen R. Thorpe, Colin Hill, Joe Bress and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniels
SIMMONS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10213
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
