Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-14334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Harrison, Sr v. Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas et al
as 3:2017cv02082
Plaintiff:
Davie Harrison, Sr
Defendant:
Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas, Sarah Anne Chang, Joshua Alexis Lemmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Mohammed et al
as 4:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Davie Harrison, Sr
Defendant:
Fayez Mohammed, Rebecca Medlock, Yvonne K. Haung, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. USA
as 1:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
DAVIE HARRISON, SR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Davie Harrison v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-40395
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVIE HARRISON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE
Davie Harrison v. John Arasor, et al
as 11-10568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVIE HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE DALLAS DIVISION, JOHN ARAGOR, Agent, and Other Unknown Names John Doe Agents, UNITED STATES JUSTICE DEPARTMENT and others
Harrison v. Arasor et al
as 3:2011cv00712
Plaintiff:
Davie Harrison
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service Dallas Division, John Aragor, US Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davie Harrison v. United States Marshal Service, et al
as 10-10720
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVIE HARRISON, also known as Davie Harrison, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Execuitve Director for Texas Department of Criminal Justice and BRUCE ZELLER, Regional Director for Region V
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
