Cases 1 - 10 of 3,911
Davis v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company et al
as 1:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Craig Davis
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, Metro-North Railroad Company and |MTA Metro-North Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davis Skurski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Marie Davis Skurski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America v. Davis
as 24-989
Defendant:
DERRILYN NEEDHAM, RONALD KNIBBS, RODERICK GUNN and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Dan Davis and Mary Davis
Defendant:
Exactech Inc, Exactech U.S. Inc., TPG Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Akima Global Services et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Damion G.V Davis
Defendant:
Akima Global Services, Malony, Glennon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffith v. Harvey et al
as 1:2024cv02714
Plaintiff:
Mr. Brandon L. Griffith
Defendant:
Warden Mrs. Harvey, Captain Payne, C.O. DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Royce
as 24-863
Petitioner:
LASHAWAN DAVIS
Defendant:
MARK ROYCE, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctinoal Facility
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
