Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DAWKINS v. DRAGONETTI
as 2:2022cv03768
Plaintiff:
PAULETTE DAWKINS
Defendant:
GEORGE E DRAGONETTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
DAWKINS v. LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02804
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE DAWKINS
Defendant:
LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., AMERICAN REGENT, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dawkins v. Ransom et al
as 3:2020cv01467
Defendant:
Paul Mooney, John Doe, Kevin Ransom and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Love Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D.G. v. READING SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2020cv00917
Defendant:
ALLEN DAWKINS, READING SCHOOL DISTRICT and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
D.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWKINS-PHILSON v. INGENIOUS DESIGN, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04394
Defendant:
HOME SHOPPING NETWORK, INGENIOUS DESIGN, LLC and HSNI, LLC
Plaintiff:
SHERICE DAWKINS-PHILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAWKINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04733
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. DAWKINS, III and BARBARA DAWKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , RICHARD ROSS, JR. , PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2016cv01187
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY , SHUMAN JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER , DERRICK DAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAWKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00952
Petitioner:
TROY DAWKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Holz v. City of Alexandria, Virginia et al
as 1:2015cv00837
Plaintiff:
Tim E. Holz
Defendant:
City of Alexandria, Virginia, Circuit Court of Alexandria and c/o Nolen B. Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
