Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
AA v. United States Department of State
as 26-2119
Plaintiff:
AA, AA SPOUSE, AA CHILD 1 and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MARCO RUBIO, In his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of State, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Defense Distributed, et al v. John Elik, et al
as 26-12808
Plaintiff:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, DD FOUNDATION, LLC. and DEFCAD, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN ELIK, MATTHEW LAROSIERE, ALEXANDER HOLLADAY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Williams, DDS et al
as 1:2026cv04733
Plaintiff:
Ebony King
Defendant:
Colin E. Williams, DDS and Community Healthcare Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
DD Traders, Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 1:2026cv03471
Plaintiff:
DD Traders, Inc. doing business as DEMDACO
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States of America
Defense Distributed, et al v. John Elik, et al
as 26-12667
Plaintiff:
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED, DD FOUNDATION, LLC. and DEFCAD, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN ELIK, MATTHEW LAROSIERE, ALEXANDER HOLLADAY and others
Stewart v. Malmandier
as 26-2058
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER STEWART
Defendant:
Ms. MALMANDIER, Supervisor, Middletown DDS and DAPHNE, after hours phone operator
Travis McCrae v. Dr. Griffin
as 26-1973
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MCCRAE, a/k/a Travis McCrea, a/k/a Travis McCrae
Defendant:
DR. GRIFFIN, DDS and AFLAC INSURANCE COMPANY
FREEDLAND v. ELAVON, INC. et al
as 1:2026cv00717
Plaintiff:
DR. ROBERT D. FREEDLAND, DDS, P.A.
Defendant:
ELAVON, INC. and PAYCHEX, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
