Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Eulalia Tino-De La Cruz, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1642
Petitioner:
Eulalia Lourdes Tino-De La Cruz and P.M.Z.T.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
United States v. Jose Medina De La Cruz
as 23-3774
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Francisco Medina De La Cruz, also known as Spider
Abrego et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02818
Plaintiff:
Joseph Abrego, Antonio Aguilar, Jose R Aguilera and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Darryl Chambers v. Chelsea De La Cruz, et al
as 23-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darryl R. Chambers
Defendant / Appellee:
Chelsea De La Cruz, Case Manager, Tecumseh State Prison, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Scott R. Frakes, Director, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center, Michael Coleman, Case Manager, Nebraska State Penitentiary, All employed at Lincoln Correctional Center and others
De La Cruz v. Doe
as 2:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Steve De La Cruz
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States v. Maria Nava
as 22-2914
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Maria De La Cruz Nava, also known as Maria De La Cruz-Nava
Williams v. Frakes et al
as 4:2022cv03071
Plaintiff:
Cameron Williams
Defendant:
Scott Frakes, Brad Hansen, Captain Unknown Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Daniel De La Cruz-Avalos
as 21-2947
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Daniel De La Cruz-Avalos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
