Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SAINT ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER, INC. et al v. CRANEWARE, INC. et al
as 4:2024cv00112
Defendant:
CRANEWARE PLC, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA and CRANEWARE, INC.
Plaintiff:
SUMMIT MEDICAL GROUP, INC. and SAINT ELIZABETH MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Cross-Defendant:
CRANEWARE PLC and CRANEWARE, INC.
Cross-Complainant:
DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
GREENE v. DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 4:2018cv00099
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
TABITHA GREENE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWINGTON v. NEGANGARD et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BREWINGTON
Defendant:
EDWARD J. CONNOR, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN DOES, 1 THROUGH 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE et al v. PROSECUTOR, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2008cv00436
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and STEVE MORRIS
Defendant:
PROSECUTOR, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA, MAYOR, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, PROSECUTOR AND SHERIFF OF SCOTT COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JORDAN v. DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JORDAN, JR.
Defendant:
DEARBORN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF DAVID LUSBY, DEPUTY KIMMICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Helcher, et al v. Dearborn County, Indiana, Boar, et al
as 07-3949
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN HELCHER, MERRY HELCHER and CINCINNATI BELL WIRELESS LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, JAKE HOOG, Vice Chairman, Dearborn County Board of Zoning Appeals, in his official and individual capacities, JANE OHLMANSEIK, Secretary Dearborn County Board of Zoning Appeals, in her official and individual capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
