Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carleton v. Bearce, et al
as 23-1327
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN T. CARLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC BEARCE, ALAN WINTLE, MARIE LANDRY and others
CARLETON v. BEARCE et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
RYAN T CARLETON
Defendant:
CO ERIC BEARCE, C/O WINTLE, JA MARIE LANDRY and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Olivera et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Winston
Defendant:
Tony Olivera, Josephine Bird, Briann Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. MacEachern et al
as 1:2011cv10770
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ortiz
Defendant:
Duane MacEachern, Terry Marshall, Kevin Sabourin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Wall, et al
as 10-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAVEN E. TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, JAKE GADSDEN, TONY AMARAL and others
Aljammi v. Wall, et al
as 09-2616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALIL R. ALJAMMI
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, in his individual and official capacity, JAMES VIERRA, in his individual and official capacity, RONALD BRULE, in his individual and official capacity and others
Aljammi v. Wall et al
as 1:2009cv00375
Plaintiff:
Khalil R. Aljammi
Defendant:
A. T. Wall, James Vierra, Ronald Brule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palermo v. Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent et al
as 1:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Christopher Palermo
Defendant:
Rockingham County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, Ken Threlfail and Debbie LNU
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tucker v. Wall et al
as 1:2007cv00406
Plaintiff:
Deaven E. Tucker
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jake Gadsden, Tony Amaral and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangano v. Bellotti, et al
as 05-2291
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MANGANO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL BELLOTTI, PETER PERRONCELLO, SUSAN CLARK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
