Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thomas Matherly v. J.F. Andrew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6473
Plaintiff - Appellant: THOMAS SHANE MATHERLY
Defendant - Appellee: J.F. ANDREWS, DEBORAH A. GONZALES, CANDICE GREGORY and others
Ebel v. Taylor et al
as 5:2012ct03130
Plaintiff: Peter M. Ebel
Defendant: Andre Taylor, Kenneth McKoy, D. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. Johns et al
as 5:2012ct03015
Plaintiff: Arlon David Simpson
Defendant: Tracy Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales, Jennifer Godwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hall v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03214
Plaintiff: Clyde M. Hall
Defendant: Tracy Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales, Thomas Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francis et al v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03005
Plaintiff: Daniel H. King
Defendant: Tracy Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales, Candice Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aldrich v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03016
Plaintiff: Paul N. Aldrich
Defendant: Tracy Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matherly v. Johns et al
as 5:2011ct03020
Plaintiff: Thomas Shane Matherly
Defendant: Tracy W. Johns, Deborah A. Gonzales, Candice Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mario Morales v. K. White, et al
as 08-6411
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARIO A. MORALES
Defendant - Appellee: K. M. WHITE, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director, BRUCE PEARSON, Warden, FCI-Memphis, DEBORAH A. GONZALES, FCI-Memphis, A.W. and others
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner: Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent: John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morales v. White et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv02018
Plaintiff: Mario A. Morales
Defendant: Deborah A. Gonzales, Heffron, Wynder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?