Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sewell v. Chasanow
as 1:2016cv03256
Plaintiff:
Starsha M. Sewell
Defendant:
Deborah K. Chasanow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coulibaly et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2015cv03276
Plaintiff:
Tiemoko Coulibaly and Fatou Gaye-Coulibaly
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., United States of America, Deborah K. Chasanow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP), et al. v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv02110
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Deborah K. Chasanow , Richard D. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Marinna L. Callaway , Jose Jehuda Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Rafa-El v. Obama et al
as 1:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Raaj Rafa-El
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Martin O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHASE v. JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE et al
as 8:2012cv03573
Plaintiff:
Warren Chase
Defendant:
JUDGE CATHERINE C. BLAKE, JUDGE DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MARYLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Blake et al
as 8:2011cv01614
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Catherine C. Blake, Deborah K. Chasanow, Benson Everett Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Blake et al
as 8:2011cv01410
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Catherine C. Blake, Deborah K. Chasanow, Benson E. Legg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. Chasanow et al
as 8:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Derek N. Jarvis
Defendant:
Deborah K. Chasanow, Charles B. Day, Peter J. Messitte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
