Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thiele v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Steve Thiele
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Peng v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leon Peng
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Miller v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
George Miller
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Moore v. J.W. Marriott, Jr. et al
as 8:2019cv00830
Defendant:
Susan C. Schwab, Mary K. Bush, Marriott International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John P. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Moore v. J.W. Marriott, Jr. et al
as 1:2019cv01776
Defendant:
Susan C. Schwab, Mary K. Bush, Lawrence W. Kellner and others
Nominal Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John P. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alves v. Sorenson et al
as 8:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Deborah Marriott Harrison, Frederick A Henderson, Bao Giang Val Bauduin and others
Plaintiff:
Edmund Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj
In re Twitter, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 1:2018cv00062
Defendant:
Richard Costolo , Anthony Noto , Jack Dorsey and others
Plaintiff:
Jim Porter
Consol_plaintiff:
Ernesto Espinoza and Francis Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARSHALL v. WGL HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL D. BARNES, GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
