Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 3:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
DWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DEBRA ZAMBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
KOVALENKO v. GONZALEZ et al
as 2:2007cv01153
Plaintiff:
OLENA KOVALENKO
Defendant:
EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Soe et al v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2007cv02439
Plaintiff:
Saw Soe and Cherry H. Tun
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzalez, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Debra Zamberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
KOURKLINSKI v. GONZALES et al
as 2:2007cv00926
Plaintiff:
ANDREI K. KOURKLINSKI
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
GUNDUZ v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00780
Plaintiff:
KADIR GUNDUZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HOOSHYAR v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00647
Plaintiff:
DARYOUSH HOOSHYAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
