Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Tserpelis v. Dechert LLP et al
as 1:2026cv07769
Plaintiff:
ELENI TSERPELIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SHEEHAN, DECHERT LLP and MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Druhan v. Talwani et al
as 1:2024cv12789
Plaintiff:
Robert Druhan
Defendant:
Moderna TX, Inc, Judge Indira Talwani and Dechert LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
El Omari v. Dechert LLP
as 24-1970
Defendant:
DECHERT LLP, NICHOLAS PAUL DEL ROSSO and VITAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
OUSSAMA EL OMARI
Hango v. Eskew
as 24-1269
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SAMUEL HANGO
Defendant:
DAVID ESKEW, DECHERT LLP, CARLYNE TURNER BEVERLY, Descher LLP Law Firm and others
El Omari v. Dechert LLP et al
as 1:2023cv04607
Plaintiff:
Oussama El Omari
Defendant:
Dechert LLP, Nicholas Paul Del Rosso and Vital Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
SOLOMON v. DECHERT LLP et al
as 1:2022cv03137
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SOLOMON
Defendant:
DECHERT LLP, DAVID NEIL GERRARD, DAVID GRAHAM HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Azima et al v. Dechert LLP et al
as 1:2022cv08728
Plaintiff:
Farhad Azima, ALG Transportation, Inc., Main 3269 LLC and others
Defendant:
Dechert LLP, David Neil Gerrard, Nicholas Del Rosso and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
El Omari v. Buchanan
as 22-55
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oussama El Omari
Defendant / Appellee:
James E.D. Buchanan, Dechert LLP, Andrew D. Frank, AKA Andrew D. Solomon and others
Defendant:
Intelligence Online
In re: Ex Parte Application of
as 21-3070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PIERRE GERGI BOUTROS YOUSSEF and MANSOUR FARID SUCCAR
Defendant / Appellee:
DECHERT LLP
Appellee:
IRAQ TELECOM LIMITED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
