Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Coffelt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tammy Dee Coffelt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Welch v. Gay et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
John Ellis Welch
Defendant:
Dee David Gay, Sumner County Jail, Tara A. Wyllie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upchurch v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Upchurch
Defendant:
Timothy Dee Dodd and The Robertson Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Thackston v. Mauldin et al
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Marlon Thackston
Defendant:
Eric Scott Mauldin, David Allen Doyle and Dee Gayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Selfmade LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Selfmade LLC doing business as Mingles Hookah Lounge and Billie Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Communications Act of 1934
McCurry v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
D Kelly Thomas, Joseph Ahillen, Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Valentine v. Gay
as 3:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Valentine
Defendant:
Dee David Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dalton v. Johnston et al
as 2:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Dalton
Defendant:
Dee Johnston, Jefferson City Police Department, Andrew Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
