Cases 1 - 10 of 352
Moore v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Donna Dee Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mojica v. Jirasek et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Dean Anthony Mojica
Defendant:
Blake Jirasek, Brian Connolly, Dee McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rutherford v. Linthieum et al
as 4:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Scott Rutherford
Defendant:
Lannette Linthieum, Owen Murray, Philip Keiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentinis-Dee v. Real Estate Value
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Real Estate Value
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Oluwaseun v. Mayokas et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Petitioner:
Shomefun Oluwaseun and John Dee
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayokas, Charles Markos, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Valentinis-Dee v. Federal Detention Center - Houston
as 9:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Federal Detention Center - Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beem v. Midwest Logistics Systems Ltd. et al
as 6:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Beem
Defendant:
Midwest Logistics Systems Ltd., Dee Equipment Leasing LLC and Keith Sierra Gully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vincent v. Cooke County, et al.
as 4:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Shawn Vincent
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Wesley Dee Gentry and Cooke County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
