Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Valentinis-Dee v. Real Estate Value
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Real Estate Value
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Valentinis-Dee v. Federal Detention Center - Houston
as 9:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Federal Detention Center - Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beem v. Midwest Logistics Systems Ltd. et al
as 6:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Michael Albert Beem
Defendant:
Midwest Logistics Systems Ltd., Dee Equipment Leasing LLC and Keith Sierra Gully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vincent v. Cooke County, et al.
as 4:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Shawn Vincent
Defendant:
Sheriffs Deputy Wesley Dee Gentry and Cooke County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Sells et al
as 9:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Asst Warden Edward B. Sells, Leana C Combs, Michael Dees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Sells et al
as 1:2021cv00572
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Asst Warden Edward B. Sells, Leana C Combs, Michael Dees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heldenbrand v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00214
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Danny Dee Heldenbrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mullenax v. Everhart Transportation, Inc. et al
as 6:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Philip Nowell and Everhart Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Misty Dee Mullenax
Not Classified By Court:
Randy Akin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
