Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Sarjeant et al v. City of Long Beach et al
as 3:2024cv01216
Defendant:
ALLIED FLUID PRODUCTS CORP., formerly known as ALLIED PACKING & SUPPLY, INC., KM Industries Holding Co., Inc., formerly known as Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc., Owl Companies, individually and as parent, alter-ego-equitable trustee, joint venture, and as succesoor-in-interest to Smith-Amelco and Owl Constuctors, formerly known as HC. Smith Construction Co. and others
Plaintiff:
James Sarjeant and Lucretia Sarjeant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jacob v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association et al
as 2:2023cv07414
Plaintiff:
Herbert J Jacob, Jr., Margaret R Jacob, Richard E Jacob and others
Defendant:
Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, Eagle Inc., Bayer CropScience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Sibley v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv07697
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Sibley and Maria Sibley
Defendant:
Blackmer Pump Company, EATON CORPORATION individually and sii to Vickers Pump;, VIKING PUMP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris et al v. CBS Corporation, et al.
as 4:2018cv07572
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of Delaval Steam Turbine Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Elsie Harris and Michael Roy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Wayne Yocum, et al v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 17-56344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAYNE YOCUM and TINA YOCUM
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor in interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of Delaval Steam Turbine Co. and others
David Bennett, et al v. Crane Co., et al
as 17-55824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PAUL BENNETT and NAOMI BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
CRANE CO
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AKA Buffalo Pumps, Inc., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp, successor-by-merger to CBS Corp. A Pennsylvania, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corp and others
David Bennett, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 17-55718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PAUL BENNETT and NAOMI BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AKA Buffalo Pumps, Inc.
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp, successor-by-merger to CBS Corp. A Pennsylvania, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corp, CERTAINTEED, CORP. and others
REEVES et al v. ALCOA et al
as 2:2011cv33344
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ALCOA , BERNUTH, LEMBCKE CO., INC., CENTRAL GULF STEAMSHIP CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO. , OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cross_defendant:
TEXACO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33857
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. , BALDBUTTE SHIPPING CO. , BERNUTH, LEMBCKE CO., INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
AMERICAN SHIP BUILDING COMPANY , BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HADLEY et al v. BLACK SHIPS INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33572
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
BLACK SHIPS INC. , GULF OIL COMPANY , KEYSTONE SHIPPING COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
