Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Stotts v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00226
Defendant:
Bonneville Power Administration, James Calvin Brown, Department of Energy and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Stotts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Personal Injury
Favre et al v. U.S. Department of Energy et al
as 1:2010cv03761
Plaintiff:
Glenn Favre and Dale Capelout
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Inspector General, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010cv11602
Plaintiff:
John Demos
Defendant:
United States of America, President of the United States, Department of the Treasury, Secretary of and others
Sandoval v. Martinez-Barnish et al
as 1:2009cv02434
Plaintiff:
Cindy H. Sandoval and Cindy H. Sandoval
Defendant:
Anna Martinez-Barnish and United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Stephenson v. Digital Angel et al
as 2:2008cv00791
Plaintiff:
William Stephenson
Defendant:
Digital Angel, United Way of Central Ohio, Ohio State University and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Melton v. United States of America, et al.
as 1:2008cv00877
Plaintiff:
Clifford Melton and Clifford Melton
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Department of Energy
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCCRACKEN v. BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02934
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, JEFFERSON SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BREVETTI v. CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67520
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO BREVETTI
Defendant:
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
