Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11850
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11679
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv40089
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Collins v. Boston Public Health Commission et al
as 1:2021cv10940
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Boston Public Health Commission, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
Manley Collins and Pro Se Party Manley M. Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Young v. Department of Justice
as 1:2021cv10869
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Violette v. Fandryer et al
as 4:2021cv40050
Defendant:
Radm S. Spaulding, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Dr. Fandryer and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Violette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv40051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2021cv10486
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Young v. United States Department Of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv10226
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General and United States Department Of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. Abell et al
as 1:2020cv11834
Defendant:
Shilo McLeod-Abell, Shilo Luciano-Abell, Commonwealth of Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
