Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Gomez-Camarena v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11280
Defendant:
Immigration Review, Executive Office of, MERRICK GARLAND and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Gomez-Camarena
Day v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2021cv10991
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, ICE, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Dillia M. Day
Gifford v. Department of Justice
as 2:2021mc50496
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Gifford
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Scholtes v. Michigan Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Mike Shannon, Darin Mentink, Mark Curtis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Scholtes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
People of the Temple No. 13 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2021cv10328
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice / DEA, Oakland County Pros Office, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
People of the Temple No. 13
Maki v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv13228
Defendant:
Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Chad Wolf, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Annie Maki and Annie Maki [E-filer]
Gifford v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv12889
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Gifford
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Uglis v. Macomb County Sheriff et al
as 2:2020cv12675
Plaintiff:
Kevin Paul Uglis
Defendant:
Macomb County Sheriff, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice and others
Mathis v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2020cv00866
Defendant:
United States Postmaster General, United States Attorney General, United States Marshal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis and RESTRICTED FILER Evonna Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2020cv00838
Plaintiff:
Evonna Mathis and RESTRICTED FILER Evonna Mathis
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
