Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Benjamin-Macon Bell, Jr. v. SC Dept. Social Services
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN-MACON BELL, JR.
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and ANISHA LUDLEY
Bell v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2023cv06051
Plaintiff:
Benjamin-Macon Bell, Jr and Benjamin-Macon: Bell, Jr
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services and Anisha Ludley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linwood Haskins, Sr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 23-1024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINWOOD SYLVESTER HASKINS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement, COREY L. POINDEXTER, Assistant Attorney General III, TONY NELSON, District Manager - Central Virginia Office and others
Calvin Latimer v. US Social Security
as 15-2601
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN G. LATIMER and SANDRA LATIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, EASTER SEALS and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Latimer et al v. US Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2012cv00406
Defendant:
US Social Security Administration , Easter Seals and NC Department of Social Services
Plaintiff:
Calvin Latimer and Sandra Latimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Commonwealth of Virginia et al., v. SupportKids Services, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia , William C. Mims and Department of Social Services, Division of Child Support Enforcement
Defendant:
SupportKids Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rutledge v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2009cv00483
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Social Services, Catherine Lee, Virginia Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
