Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Derrick Cain v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DENNIS CHRISTIE, JANE GILLIS and others
Derrick Cain v. Brian Rinehart, et al
as 22-1893
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN RINEHART, U.S. Marshal and JOHN DOE, Unknown U.S. Marshals Task Force Officers of the Detroit Fugitive Apprehension Team
Derrick Cain v. Brian Rinehart, et al
as 21-1713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN RINEHART, U.S. Marshal and JOHN DOE, Uknown U.S. Marshals Task Force Officers of the Detroit Fugitive Apprehension Team
Derrick Cain v. The People of the State of MI, et al
as 19-1879
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD SNYDER, DANIEL MARTIN, C. MASKEY and others
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK CAIN and DERRICK D. CAIN
Derrick Cain v. MDOC, et al
as 11-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
Derrick Cain v. P. Caruso, et al
as 10-2502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK D. CAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
P. CARUSO, in her individual capacity and in her official and individual capacities under R.L.U.I.P.A., L. TRIBLEY, in his individual capacity and in his official and individual capacities under R.L.U.I.P.A., T. SMITH, in his individual capacity and in his official and individual capacities under R.L.U.I.P.A. and others
Cain #256881 v. Caruso et al
as 2:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Cain #256881
Defendant:
P. Caruso, L. Tribley, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain #256881 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00543
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Cain #256881
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia L. Caruso, D. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
