Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States of America v. Reid (Soto)
as 24-647
Defendant:
CASWELL SENIOR, DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
WHITED v. GAINES et al
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS WHITED
Defendant:
GAINES, BLACKSHEAR, FOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Thomas
as 23-10859
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tayron Deshawn Thomas
United States of America v. Reid (Thornton)
as 23-6871
Defendant:
DWIGHT REID, CHRISTOPHER ERSKINE, WALTER LUSTER and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRINAE THORNTON and Luxury
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15984
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN THOMAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Reid (Austin)
as 22-3219
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dwight Reid, AKA Dick Wolf, Christopher Erskine, AKA Beagle, Walter Luster, AKA Shells and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Naya Austin, AKA Baby
United States of America v. Reid (Crisler)
as 22-2688
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dwight Reid, AKA Dick Wolf, Christopher Erskine, AKA Beagle, Walter Luster, AKA Shells and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jarrett Crisler, Jr., AKA Jayecee
Thomas v. Town of Goshen Municipality
as 7:2021cv02045
Defendant:
Town of Goshen Municipality, Bloise and County of Orange
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2020cv00896
Petitioner:
Corey Deshawn Thomas
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2020cv00175
Petitioner:
COREY DESHAWN THOMAS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
