Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Washam et al v. Dews et al
as 2:2018cv00603
Defendant:
Arlyene Marie Dews and Wadcorp Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
M. S. W. and Michael Washam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Dew-Paige v. Oakland Housing Authority
as 3:2018cv01722
Plaintiff:
Alma Dew-Paige
Defendant:
Oakland Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
David Dew v. Shawn Hatton, et al
as 17-56268
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID L. DEW
Respondent - Appellee:
SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Warden of Correctional Training Facility- Soledad and SCOTT KERNAN
Dew et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01698
Plaintiff:
James Dew and Carol Dew
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dews et al v. Coastal Transport Company Incorporated
as 4:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Claudia Dews and Michael Dews
Defendant:
Coastal Transport Company Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Dew
as 2:2016mc00081
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Ronald Dew
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Polyportables, LLC v. Endurequest, et al.
as 1:2016cv01291
Defendant:
Endurequest Corporation, Ken Dewing and Robert Davis
Plaintiff:
Polyportables, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dew v. Hatton et al
as 3:2016cv01985
Petitioner:
David L. Dew
Respondent:
Shawn Hatton and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porter et al v. Driftwood Hayward Operating Company LLC
as 3:2016cv01586
Plaintiff:
Humphrey Garrett , Lawrence Garrett , Tommy Garrett and others
Defendant:
Driftwood Hayward Operating Company LLC , Driftwood HealthCare & Wellness Center, LLC, Nathanette Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04267
Plaintiff:
John Beneda, Shari Beneda, Doris Cater and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
