Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Simpkins v. DuPage Housing Authority et al
as 1:2015cv09103
Plaintiff:
Anthony Simpkins
Defendant:
DuPage Housing Authority and DHA Management Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00450
Plaintiff:
The DHA Corporation
Defendant:
BRC Operating Co, LLC, Frutarom USA Inc., Frutarom Industries LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 9:2015mc80201
Plaintiff:
The DHA Corporation
Defendant:
BRC Operating Co, LLC and Hagelin & Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Didier Hardy
Movant:
Gina Cieri
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 4:2015mc10008
Plaintiff:
The DHA Corporation
Defendant:
BRC Operating Co, LLC and Hagelin & Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Didier Hardy
Movant:
Gina Cieri
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Delesandri et al
as 4:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
John N. Delesandri, Robert W. Baker and Round DHA, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 9:2014mc81523
Movant:
INTERAMERICAS BEVERAGES INC
Plaintiff:
THE DHA CORPORATION
Defendant:
BRC OPERATING CO, LLC and Hagelin & Company
Thirdparty_defendant:
Didier Hardy
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
The DHA Corporation v. BRC Operating Co, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03186
Plaintiff:
The DHA Corporation
Defendant:
BRC Operating Co, LLC and Hagelin & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MATTIACCIO v. DHA GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
GENNARO MATTIACCIO, II
Defendant:
DHA GROUP, INC. , AMI GETU and DAVID HALE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
