Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Suhr v. Dietrich et al
as 2:2023cv01697
Plaintiff:
Daniel Suhr
Defendant:
Dean R. Dietrich, Jane Ellen Bucher, Margaret Wrenn Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Evans v. Haupt et al
as 2:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Ladell A Evans
Defendant:
Sgt Matthew Haupt and Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Olson, Daniel v. Sauk County et al
as 3:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Olson
Defendant:
Sauk County, Aegis Corporation, Cross Jenks Mercer Maffei and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones, Daniel v. Halvorson et al
as 3:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Officer Dietrich, Inspector Holly Hartley, Officer Lt Sayles and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Damont'a et al v. Dittmann, Michael et al
as 3:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
Damont'a D. Jones
Defendant:
Michael Dittmann , Dittman, Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redman v. Doehling et al
as 2:2017cv00239
Plaintiff:
Richard Redman
Defendant:
L Doehling and Christine Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Czapiewski et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
David Czapiewski, Anthony Riach, Larry Andrews and others
Defendant:
Kurt Thomas , Jessi Rhines , John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Czapiewski, David et al v. Thomas, Kurt et al
as 3:2015cv00654
Plaintiff:
David Czapiewski, Anthony Riach, Larry Andrews and others
Defendant:
Kurt Thomas , Kieth Frey, Jessi Rhines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Von Waldemar, Dietrich v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Dietrich Von Waldemar
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
