Cases 61 - 70 of 196
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant:
James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner:
First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent:
STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
LULAC, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 17-71636
Petitioner:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK NORTH AMERICA, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency, SCOTT PRUITT, Administrator of United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Intervenor:
STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Amicus Curiae:
DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, MIGRANT CLINICIANS NETWORK, HEALTH PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS and others
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al
as 20-56280
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
In re Clean Water Act Rulemaking
as 3:2020cv04636
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler and US Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff:
Idaho Rivers United, California Trout, American Whitewater and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, American Petroleum Institute and National Hydropower Association
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Mississippi, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler
as 20-73276
Petitioner:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, as Adminsitrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Environmental Protection Agency
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant:
andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff:
state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-16606
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL SACKETT, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors and CHANTELL SACKETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
