Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Haydar Khafaji v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 20-55449
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VOONG, CHIEF, within the office of appeal, BRIAN ROBERTS, Parole Board Commissioner, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden of R.J.D. State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYDAR AL KHAFAJI, AKA Hydar Al Khafati
Gregory Goods v. David Baughman, et al
as 20-15365
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID BAUGHMAN, Warden, WHITEHEAD, Correctional Officer and DOBBS, Correctional Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY GOODS
Arthur et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2019cv08435
Plaintiff:
Gary Young, Jeffrey Schackart, Steven Boyd and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Dobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01449
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Dobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019at00730
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Nathan Dobbs v. Subaru of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01853
Defendant:
Subaru of America, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Subaru of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dobbs v. Gila County Jail et al
as 2:2018cv03258
Respondent:
Gila County Jail and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Dobbs, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard Dobbs v. TXI Riverside, Inc., et al
as 18-56054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DOBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
TXI RIVERSIDE, INC., DBA TXI Riverside Cement Co. and UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
Ennis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
L. Kelly, Whitehead, M. Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
