Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cumber v. VA. DOC
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
William Edward Cumber, III
Respondent:
VA. DOC and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhoades v. Sellars et al
as 2:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kyle Rhoades
Defendant:
Nurse Sellars, Nurse Sutton and Doc. Tamalin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. VA DOC
as 3:2023cv00735
Petitioner:
Diallo O. Turner
Respondent:
VA DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawkins v. DOC Employee
as 3:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
Corry A. Dawkins
Defendant:
DOC Employee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Saad Lodhi
Defendant:
Tremayne Dameron, Commissioner of DOC, Director of DOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vaughan v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00619
Petitioner:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shearin v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Charles McCoy Shearin
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, VA Dept. of Corr., Administrative Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan, Jr. v. L.E.G.
as 3:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
L.E.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
