Cases 11 - 20 of 1,310
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARSH
Defendant:
HENDRICKS COUNTY, INDIANA and JOHN DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROSBY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY
Defendant:
J. KALLIS, OFFICER JANE DOE, SAJNAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUBY v. GAINS et al
as 4:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY RUBY
Defendant:
RONNIE GAINS, NEW ALBANY POLICE DEPT., BRIDGET ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, FONSECA, COATIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REEVES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REEVES
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMERSON, NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
