Cases 21 - 30 of 427
WEATHERS v. FRANCIS et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. WEATHERS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANCIS, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. DENMEN et al
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
DENMEN, LEE, SHERRY DON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, B. LALOUX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. VANIHEL et al
as 1:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JANE DOE, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISH v. HINSHAW et al
as 2:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
TONY PARISH
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW, PENNINGTON, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARRA v. CREAR et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
GERMAN PARRA
Defendant:
CREAR, BOSTOCK, SPAYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02123
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ALLEN
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, JOHN DOE, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLDER v. SIMONS et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
DAVID TRA-VON HOLDER
Defendant:
SIMONS, MARION COUNTY ADC SUPERVISORS and JOHN DOE/JANE DOE (ETL) 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. FOUNTAIN COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2023cv01814
Plaintiff:
Brian S. Payne
Defendant:
FOUNTAIN COUNTY SHERIFF and JOHN DOE OFFICERS
3Rd Party Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALLMAN v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
JESSICA HALLMAN
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE LLC, DEW KEVIN, SAMANTHA MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
