Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathaniel Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus L. Jarvis
Defendant:
Nathial Burl Cain, Jeworski Mallett, Timothy Morris and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOPEZ et al v. CEO OF ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2022cv06205
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ, JAMES A. EDWARDS, JOHN DOES 1-500 and others
Defendant:
CEO OF ANCORA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL, NICHOLAS MCDONNELL, CHIEF OF HUMAN SERVICES POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dopp v. FBI, et al.
as 2:2020cv00063
Respondent:
ICAC, Freemont County, DEA and others
Petitioner:
Sidney D Dopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonilla v. Battaglia et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Ruben B. Brooks, Gonzalez P. Curiel, Conspiracy Members Jone Doe 1-500 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00317
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith v. Holmes et al
as 0:2014cv62174
Plaintiff:
Hezee-Marshay Smith
Defendant:
Ilona M. Holmes, Cynthia Azari, Michael J. Satz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00645
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
