Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Hillary v. St. Lawrence County
as 22-773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Oral Nicholas Hillary
Defendant / Appellee:
St. Lawrence County, Mary E. Rain, Unidentified Jane and John Doe 1-10 St. Lawrence County Employees and others
Fernandez v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2022cv06162
Plaintiff:
Luis Fernandez
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Police Sgt. Osipovitch, Police Officer Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Shakeerah Johnson
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Janine Musmacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cagan v. Rittenhouse et al
as 2:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Tod S. Cagan
Defendant:
Gregory Rittenhouse, Michael Philbin, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv09607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARR v. WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY et al
as 2:2021cv01560
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIE HARR
Defendant:
WASHINGTON AREA HUMANE SOCIETY, JOHN DOES 1-10, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
