Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cesario Medina v. Pitchess Detention Center South Facility, et al
as 23-55109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CESARIO VIZCARRA MEDINA
Defendant / Appellee:
PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER SOUTH FACILITY, PITCHESS DETENTION CENTER NORTH FACILITY, MCJ LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin Lipman, et al v. Armond Budish, et al
as 19-3914
Defendant:
URSULA OWENS, TEQUILA CRUMP and JOHN/JANE DOE, I-VII, individually and/or agents of Cuyahoga County
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHABRINA MCCLOUD and KEVIN LIPMAN, Administrator of the Estate of Ta'Naejah McCloud, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA QUINT, individually and/or agents of Cuyahoga County, ARMOND D. BUDISH, Cuyahoga County Executive, MARQUETESE BETTS, individually and/or agents of Cuyahoga County and others
Lipman et al v. County Executive Cuyahoga County et al
as 1:2018cv02985
Defendant:
Ursula Owens, Armond Budish, John/Jane Doe I-VII and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lipman and Shabrina McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rounds et al v. Idaho Peace Officers Standards and Training Council
as 4:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Trevor Scott Rounds
Defendant:
Idaho Peace Officers Standards and Training Council, William L. Flink and John Does I-VII
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Margeson v. White County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brenda Margeson
Defendant:
White County, Tennessee , Oddie Shoupe , Thomas Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kucheynik et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Valeriy M. Kucheynik and Alena I. Kucheynik
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Seattle Prime Mortgage, American Brokers Conduit and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
