Cases 1 - 10 of 23
USA v. Dominique Davis
as 26-1188
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DOMINIQUE DAVIS, a/k/a Tootaz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 6:2025cv02160
Plaintiff:
Dominique Davis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedure (RESPA) Act
Davis v. Flagstar Bank
as 6:2025cv02163
Plaintiff:
Dominique Davis
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Davis v. American Express Company
as 6:2025cv02162
Plaintiff:
Dominique Davis
Defendant:
American Express Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Davis v. Yelp Inc.
as 6:2025cv02169
Plaintiff:
Dominique Davis an Individual doing business as Nikos
Defendant:
Yelp Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv02159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Davis v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv02445
Plaintiff:
Dominique Davis
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Adams et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv11861
Plaintiff:
Megan Adams, Michael Aguado, Patrick Ahearn and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Davis
as 24-1854
Defendant:
MARQUIS DOMINIQUE DAVIS, Bang Oneohone, Tiny Bang and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
