Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JACKSON v. SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01244
Plaintiff:
DONALD JACKSON
Defendant:
SPINNAKER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
KELLUM v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv04661
Plaintiff:
RASHEED KELLUM
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , WALI SHABAZZ , RICARDO DAMEUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. GAUDENZIA INC.
as 2:2014cv02310
Plaintiff:
DONALD JACKSON
Defendant:
GAUDENZIA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
DALY v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2013cv03863
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DALY
Defendant:
DONALD JACKSON, JR. and THE CITY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. JACKSON
as 2:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE D. BROWN
Defendant:
DONALD JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv03737
Plaintiff:
DONALD JACKSON and ELLEN JACKSON
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC , GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FREEMAN et al v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2010cv01458
Plaintiff:
BOBBY G. FREEMAN and JULIE SCOTT FREEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER , WILLIAM CAREY, JR. , DONALD JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANCEY v. FIBREBOARD CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv74281
Plaintiff:
DONALD JACKSON CHANCEY
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., JOHN CRANE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROWN v. JACKSON
as 2:2008cv05700
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BROWN
Defendant:
DONALD JACKSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BRICE v. CITY OF CHESTER, PA et al
as 2:2007cv01210
Plaintiff:
JEAN PIERRE BRICE
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, PA, CITY OF CHESTER POLICE OFFICER PAUL BATTINIERI and CITY OF CHESTER POLICE OFFICER DONALD JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
