Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Solomon Carter v. Wetzel, et al
as 22-1643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLOMON CARTER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, DONNA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KERI MOORE, Grievance Officer and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SECURITY OFFICER POLITO and SECURITY OFFICER DOUGLAS POLITO
Nieves v. Geroulo et al
as 4:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Vito Tim Geroulo, Tim Betti and Donna Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieves v. Smith et al
as 4:2021cv01932
Plaintiff:
Luis Nieves
Defendant:
Barry Smith, Ms. Civiello, Kari Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, C.O. 1 Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv00542
Defendant:
John Doe (1), Hayles, Donna Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Salter v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01691
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, George L. Piskorik, Donna Varner and others
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Salter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MADISON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00183
Defendant:
T. TURNER, DONNA VARNER, SUPT. MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MADISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2018cv00232
Defendant:
Superintendent BARRY SMITH, C/O III KELLY, INTELLIGENCE CAPTAIN and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
LITTLE v. HODAK et al
as 2:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN B. LITTLE
Defendant:
HODAK, SUSAN BERGEY, KOSTRYK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Stuart v. Lisiak, et al
as 15-3466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE STUART
Defendant - Appellee:
LISIAK, TONY INUZZI, KAREN HOLLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
