Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Allan Wilson v. Clerk, United States Supreme Court
as 26-5154
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Wilson
Defendant:
Clerk, United States Supreme Court
Boggs et al v. Trubey et al
as 6:2026cv00099
Defendant:
Arthur Kinsella, Susan Trubey, Patricia Wesley and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boggs and Andrea Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
WILSON v. CLERK, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2026cv00017
Plaintiff:
ALLAN DOUGLAS WILSON
Defendant:
CLERK, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
WILSON v. BRENT et al
as 1:2025cv03561
Plaintiff:
ALLAN DOUGLAS WILSON
Defendant:
DERRICK BRENT, FRANK BISIGNANO and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Colin et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11775
Plaintiff:
Aloysius Colin, Andrew Edward Stephens, Andrew Lewis Ames and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Arkema Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILSON v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CLERKS OFFICE
as 1:2025cv02852
Plaintiff:
ALLAN DOUGLAS WILSON
Defendant:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, CLERKS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamble v. Collierville Chrysler Dodge Jeep et al
as 2:2025cv02600
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GAMBLE
Defendant:
Wilson Auto Group LLC, Charles Douglas Wilson, Doug Wilson and others
Counter-Claimant:
Doug Wilson and Collierville Chrysler Dodge Jeep
Counter-Defendant:
TYRONE GAMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allan Wilson v. DOS, et al
as 24-5204
Defendant:
United States Department of State and United States Embassy Philippines
Plaintiff:
Allan Douglas Wilson
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
