Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Dowd et al
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Cresencio Alvarez, III
Defendant:
Patrik Dowd, Peter Britton, Elzabeth Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWD v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN J. DOWD
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, MAUI and JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Dowd et al
as 3:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Cresencio Alvarez, III
Defendant:
Patrick Dowd, Olmstead and Kendra Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peavy v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Peavy
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Patrick Dowd, South Bend City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Begly v. Roberts et al
as 3:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Daniel N Begly
Defendant:
Evan S Roberts, Patrick G Dowd and Peter Soldato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Orthodynamics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01504
Plaintiff:
Josephine Dowd
Defendant:
Orthodynamics, Inc., Paul Haber, Henry Riestra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE v. DOWD et al
as 1:2013cv00350
Defendant:
D. LEE BUCKINGHAM, III, JOHN DOWD, PAUL HANSARD and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PATRICK WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REYNOLDS et al v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
as 2:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR S BEAMAN, NOAH M BOREN, BRYAN K BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
CELLUAR SALES OF INDIANA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
