Cases 31 - 40 of 324
Interactive Games LLC v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01105
Plaintiff:
Interactive Games LLC
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Interactive Games LLC v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 19-1523
Appellant:
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC
Appellee:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Interactive Games LLC v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 19-1399
Appellant:
INTERACTIVE GAMES LLC
Appellee:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DraftKings Inc Vs. John Does #1-10
as 1:2018cv11869
Plaintiff:
DraftKings Inc.
Defendant:
John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Akeem Daniels, et al v. Fanduel, Inc., et al
as 17-3051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AKEEM DANIELS, CAMERON STINGILY and NICHOLAS STONER
Defendant - Appellee:
FANDUEL, INC. and DRAFTKINGS, INC.
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01041
Consolidated Defendant:
bwin.party (USA), Inc., 888 Holdings PLC, Big Fish Games, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Interactive Games LLC, Interactive Games Limited and CG Technology Development, LLC
Defendant:
FanDuel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01040
Plaintiff:
CG Technology Development, LLC , Interactive Games Limited and Interactive Games LLC
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al v. DRAFTKINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corp. et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2016cv07464
Plaintiff:
Anthem Sports & Entertainment Corp. and Fantasy Sports Network Inc.
Defendant:
DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
