Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Coene et al v. 3M Company et al
as 6:2010cv06546
Plaintiff:
Robert Coene and Valerie Coene
Defendant:
3M Company, DTM Corporation, Valimet, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-20535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holley v. DTM Corporation
as 8:2009cv01160
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Holley
Defendant:
DTM Corporation and DTM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
ITPE Pension Fund et al v. DTM Corporation
as 8:2009cv00979
Plaintiff:
ITPE Pension Fund, Dennis Arrington, Jerry Bowden and others
Defendant:
DTM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04114
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Board of Regents, Th, et al v. EOS GmbH Electro Opt
as 1:2003cv00113
Plaintiff:
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System and 3D Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems
Counter Defendant:
3D Systems Corp. and DTM Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Deckard, et al v. Electro Optical Sys, et al
as 1:2002cv00468
Plaintiff:
Electro Optical Systems (GMBH)
Defendant:
3D Systems Inc., DTM Corporation and Compression
Petitioner:
Carl Deckard and University of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
