Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MSHC, Inc. v. Da Silva
as 3:2026cv00517
Plaintiff:
MSHC, Inc. doing business as Service Logic
Defendant:
Ivanildo Norberto Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ferreira Da Silva v. Blanche
as 26-4105
Petitioner:
ALEXANDRA FERREIRA DA SILVA
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12960
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv12967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv40166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00536
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Blackwell et al
as 4:2026cv02548
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Richard Smith, Jr., Bartholomew Smith, Bart and others
Defendant:
LT. Blackwell, Major Meeks, A.W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
