Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Scott et al v. 23andMe Holding Co. et al
as 3:2023cv05980
Plaintiff:
Tracy Scott, Anna DaVeiga and Emily Beale
Defendant:
23ANDME HOLDING CO. and 23ANDME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scott et al v. 23andMe Holding Co. et al
as CAN/3:23-CV-05980
Plaintiff:
Scott, Tracy Scott, Anna DaVeiga and others
Defendant:
23andMe Holding Co, 23andMe Holding Co. and 23andMe, Inc.
Allen et al v. Salem Township
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen, Troy Campbell, Rose Campbell and others
Defendant:
Salem Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Sullivan v. M. Biter, et al
as 21-16842
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. D. BITER, Warden
Defendant:
MATTHEW CATE, J. CLARK KELSO, D. FOSTON and others
Mario Navarro v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 18-55777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, DAVID LONG, MORENO and others
Hogue v. State of California et al
as 1:2017cv00942
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Hogue
Defendant:
State of California, Kelly Harrington, Millicent Tidwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Powell v. M. Barron, et al
as 16-16620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW LAMONT POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BARRON, Correctional Officer @ CSP-Corcoran, R. GOINGS, Correctional Officer at CSP-Corcoran, I. RIVERA and others
Henderson v. Daveiga et al.
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
Darren Henderson
Defendant:
K. Daveiga, A. Shittu, M. Seaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Daveiga et al.
as 2:2016cv01466
Plaintiff:
Darren Henderson
Defendant:
K. Daveiga, A. Shittu, M. Seaman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Biter et al
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Michael John Sullivan
Defendant:
M. D. Biter, Matthew Cates, J. Clark Kelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
