Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Dahl v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dahl
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes and IDOC Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner:
Adam Dahl
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pelosi-Dahl v. Johnson
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Julie Crews Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelosi-Dahl v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Scotty Rhoden, Julie C. Johnson, Brian S. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dahl et al
as 1:2023at00957
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Andy Dahl, Fabiola Hernandez, Eric Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Adams v. Dahl et al
as 1:2023cv01608
Plaintiff:
Paul Adams
Defendant:
Andy Dahl, Fabiola Hernandez, Eric Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiliams v. Dahl et al
as 2:2023cv01172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williams, Jr
Defendant:
Tyler Dahl, D Jacobs, Jennifer Staffaroni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #757359 et al v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Williams #757359 and Robert D. Simpson #380661
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Doug Tasson, Tim Dahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevenson #479111 v. Whitler et al
as 2:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Dante Stevenson #479111
Defendant:
Unknown Whitler, Unknown Christy, Unknown Kubont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hash v. Petrovic et al
as 5:2022cv05255
Plaintiff:
Lawrence George Hash
Defendant:
D. Petrovic, M. Giacomazzi, D. Dorsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
