Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bedard v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation Health Insurance Plan
as 8:2009cv02839
Plaintiff:
Kathy Bedard
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation Health Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Meyer v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 4:2008cv00533
Plaintiff:
Edward Meyer
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Board of Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Cross v. Chrysler LLC et al
as 5:2007cv01141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Cross and Frederick Cross
Defendant:
Chrysler LLC and The Daimlerchrysler Corporation Extended Disability Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Caimi v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv01681
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Esis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Caimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Pittman v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 2:2007cv12722
Plaintiff:
Laurain Pittman
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation and DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Rutkowski v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Plan et al
as 6:2007cv00965
Plaintiff:
Michael Rutkowski
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Pension Plan and DaimlerChrysler Corporation-UAW Board of Administrators
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Roths v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv11942
Plaintiff:
Colleen Roths
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation, DaimlerChrysler Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. DaimlerChrysler Corporation
as 1:2007cv02445
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
DaimlerChrysler Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mossoian v. DaimlerChrys, et al, et al
as 06-2557
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY D. MOSSOIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and ESIS, INC
Lupo v. DaimlerChrysler Corp
as 06-1921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. LUPO
Defendant - Appellee:
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
