Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ware v. Stephens
as 7:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Duke
as 7:2015cv00127
Petitioner:
Robert Dale Ware
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Unknown Manager of Social Security
as 7:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
Unknown Manager of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ware v. Dustin Nimz, et al
as 14-10920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE WARE
Defendant - Appellee:
DUSTIN NIMZ, TODD GREENWOOD, DAVID DUKE and others
Ware v. Nimz et al
as 7:2014cv00051
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
Dustin Nimz, Todd Greenwood, David Duke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Duke
as 7:2014cv00034
Petitioner:
Robert Dale Ware
Respondent:
David Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Smith et al
as 7:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
Jim Smith, NFN Faniron and Mark Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
G.B. v. Carrion
as 12-721
Defendant:
Sefaris, YDA, Paris, Jenson and others
Plaintiff:
A.S., a minor child, by and through his parent C.S., S.S., a minor child, by and through his parent V.S., J.G., a minor child, by and through his parent B.G. and others
Appellant:
N.P., a minor child, by and through his parent D.P., S.M., a minor child, by and through her parent E.B., J.A., a minor child, by and through his parent M.F. and others
Appellee:
Gladys Carrion, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services
Ware v. Motsenbocker et al
as 7:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Ware
Defendant:
Sammy Motsenbocker and WFPD Chief Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Ware v. State of Texa
as 11-10676
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE WARE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
