Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Williams v. Ryan et al
as 2:2009cv01727
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Williams
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Carson McWilliams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marty Williams v. Attorney General of the State
as 09-5541
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARTY DALE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE
Williams v. Leonard et al
as 3:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Williams
Defendant:
Gean Leonard, Michael Henson, Sgt. Fahrino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Williams v. Dora Schriro
as 09-15352
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD DALE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA SCHRIRO
Valdez v. City of Hanford, CA et al
as 1:2008cv01572
Plaintiff:
Michael Valdez
Defendant:
City of Hanford, CA, Carlos A. Mestas, Dean Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dale William McKinley v.Gina Lynn Kershaw et al
as 5:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Dale William McKinley
Defendant:
Gina Lynn Kershaw, Jane Templeton, Kristen Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Williams v. Quarterman
as 4:2008cv00141
Petitioner:
Harvey Dale Williams
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale William McKinley, III v. Gina Lynn Kershaw et al
as 5:2007cv01392
Plaintiff:
Dale William McKinley, III
Defendant:
Gina Lynn Kershaw, Shilo Rieser and Kristen Van Dyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinley v. Kershaw et al
as 3:2007cv01904
Plaintiff:
Dale William McKinley, II
Defendant:
Gina Lynn Kershaw, Shilo Rieser and Kristen Van Dyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2007cv00867
Petitioner:
Marty Dale Williams
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
