Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Heaslet v. Daley et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Michael Clay Heaslet
Defendant:
Rardin and Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kilman v. Daley et al
as 1:2019cv03136
Plaintiff:
Tobi Kilman
Defendant:
Tyler S. Brown, Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Pat Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daley v. Alpine Urology
as 1:2015cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kelly Daley
Defendant:
Alpine Urology, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Riddle et al v. Daley
as 1:2009cv02680
Plaintiff:
Joelle Riddle, Carol Blatnick, Wayne Buck and others
Defendant:
Linda Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mountain Port, LLC v. Daley et al
as 1:2009cv00916
Plaintiff:
Mountain Port, LLC
Defendant:
Brian Daley and Maria Chedid
Counter Claimant:
Brian Daley and Maria Chedid
Counter Defendant:
Mountain Port, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02084
Plaintiff:
John Prymak, Lillian Prymak, Preston Smith and others
Defendant:
Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and Mutual Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01181
Plaintiff:
John Prymak, Lillian Prymak, Preston Smith and others
Defendant:
Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and Mutual Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Prymak et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00103
Plaintiff:
John Prymak, John Prymak, Lillian Prymak and others
Defendant:
Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc., Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc., Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
